Roll over icons to start

P + 0


Skip Navigation Links
Management Discussion and Analysis
Sustainable Development
Corporate Governance Statement
Directors' Report
Financial Report
Additional Information
List of Abbreviations
Shareholder Reporting Timetable
Corporate Directory
Skip Navigation LinksCorporate Governance Statement > Board of Directors

board of directors

Role of the Board

The Board guides and monitors the business of Paladin on behalf of shareholders, by whom they are elected and to whom they are accountable. The Board is responsible for setting corporate direction, defining policies and monitoring the business of the Company, to ensure it is conducted appropriately and in the best interests of shareholders.

The role of the Board is to oversee and guide the management of the Company with the aim of protecting and enhancing the interests of its shareholders, taking into account the interests of other stakeholders including employees, customers, suppliers and the wider community.

The Board operates under a Charter and has a written Code of Conduct which establishes guidelines for its conduct. The purpose of the Code is to ensure that Directors act honestly, responsibly, legally and ethically and in the best interests of the Company.

The Board is responsible for setting the strategic direction and establishing goals for management and the monitoring of the achievements against these goals. The Board is also responsible for CEO succession planning.

Composition of the Board

The Board comprises five Non-executive Directors, including the Chairman and one Executive Director, being the Managing Director/CEO. The names of the Directors, both in office at the date of this report and those who held the position during the past year, are set out in the Directors’ Report. This information includes their status as Non-executive, executive or independent, their qualifications and experience and length of service.

The structure of the Board has evolved over time to reflect the changing needs of the Company to ensure an appropriate mix of skills and experience are available to oversee the growth of Paladin to its full potential.

In 2010, Mr Ian Noble advised he would be retiring at the 2010 AGM. The decision was made to appoint 2 new Non-executive independent directors, increasing the size of the Board by a further director. Given the extent of the Group’s operations and its activity base this was felt necessary, particularly to facilitate the more effective use of Board committees across a broader group.

Skill sets represented at Board level include managerial, technical, financial, corporate, legal and commercial. Particularly, members have a broad range of experience and expertise in the uranium business.

Director Independence

Directors are expected to bring independent views and judgement to the Board’s deliberations. All of the Non-executive Directors are considered by the Board to be independent. In considering whether a Director is independent, the Board has regard to the independence criteria set out in the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations and the Corporate Governance Guidelines developed by the Ontario Securities Commission pursuant to National Policy 58-201 and other facts, information and circumstances that the Board considers relevant.

The Board assesses the independence of new Directors prior to appointment and reviews the independence of all Directors as appropriate.

Meetings of the Board

The Board meets formally face to face at least four times a year (each over a 3 day period). Video conferencing facilities have been installed to provide greater ease of communications between face to face meetings and meetings are held at a 6 week interval between face to face meetings, via this means. On the day preceding the Board meeting, members of senior management attend and make presentations to the Board covering all aspects of the Company’s operations. This provides an excellent opportunity for dialogue and networking, with management from all operations present. Non-executive Directors meet together without the Managing Director/CEO and management being present, prior to each of the four principal Board meetings.

The entire Board is required (as stated in their Letters of Appointment) to attend the Annual General Meeting (AGM) of the Company and all attended the 2009 AGM.

The Board holds an annual strategic planning session with management at which the Company’s strategic plans for each operating activity and the Group as a whole are presented. This is held as part of the budget review process. The Managing Director/CEO encourages full access to executive managers by the Board to ensure transparency at a senior management level. Non-executive Directors are encouraged to visit the Company’s operations annually and these visits provide the Non-executive Directors with unlimited access to all site personnel.

Retirement and Re-election

The Constitution of the Company requires one third of the Directors, other than the Managing Director, to retire from office at each AGM. Directors who have been appointed by the Board are required to retire from office at the next AGM and are not taken into account in determining the number of Directors to retire by rotation at that AGM. Directors cannot hold office for a period in excess of three years or later than the third AGM following their appointment without submitting themselves for re-election. Retiring Directors are eligible for re-election by shareholders. Details of those Directors seeking re-election at the 2010 AGM are set out in the Directors’ Report.

The Board does not believe that any Director has served on the Board for a period which could, or be perceived to, materially interfere with his ability to act in the best interests of the Company.

In reaching this conclusion, the Board has noted that each of R Crabb (the Chairman) and J Borshoff (the Managing Director/CEO) will have each served on the Board for 16 years. Notwithstanding their period of service, the Board concluded that both Directors retain independence of character and judgement and continue to make outstanding contributions at Board level. Both bring their unique skills to the Board and participate in robust constructive debate. The Board considers that Mr Borshoff’s uranium experience and Mr Crabb’s international resource law experience remains valuable at Board level. The Board further agrees that time in office should only be considered from 2004, as the period prior to 2004 the Company was a junior explorer. It is also noted that the Company did not enter the ASX/S&P 200 until June 2005.

Nomination and Appointment of New Directors

If it is necessary to appoint a new Director to fill a vacancy on the Board or to complement the existing Board, a wide potential base of possible candidates is considered and external consultants are engaged to assist in the selection process, if required. The Board assesses the qualifications of the proposed new Director against a range of criteria including background, experience, professional skills, personal qualities, the potential for the candidate’s skills to augment the existing Board and the candidate’s availability to commit to the Board’s activities. If these criteria are met and the Board appoints the candidate as a Director, that Director must retire at the next AGM and will be eligible for re-election by shareholders at that AGM.

New Directors appointed to the Board are invited to participate in an induction programme which includes provision of comprehensive written material regarding the Company such as:-

  • Information on the financial, strategic and operational position of the Company;
  • A comprehensive letter of appointment which sets out the Company’s expectations on acceptance of the position;
  • A written statement which sets out the duties, rights and responsibilities they undertake on becoming a Director together with material detailing the operations, policies and practices of the Company; and
  • Access to previous Board papers together with recent Annual Reports and interim financial statements.

Further, new Directors are invited to attend briefing sessions with the Managing Director/CEO and key members of the senior management team where they may ask questions and direct any queries they may have to the Chairman or the Managing Director/CEO or obtain any other briefings they feel necessary from the Chairman or the Managing Director/CEO. They are encouraged to attend site visits in liaison with the Managing Director/CEO, at appropriate times. Directors agree to participate in continuous improvement programmes from time to time, as considered appropriate.

Evaluation of Board Performance

Improvement in Board processes and effectiveness is a continuing objective and the primary purpose of Board evaluation is to identify ways to improve performance. The Chairman is responsible for conducting an annual review of the Board performance.

An evaluation of the performance of the Board has been carried out. This process involved completion of individual questionnaires focused on process, structure, effectiveness and contributions. Responses to the questionnaire were collated and discussed by the Board in an open forum and recommendations for improvement considered.

Knowledge, Skills and Experience

To assist Directors to maintain an appropriate level of knowledge, skill and experience in the operations of the Company, Directors have the opportunity to undertake site visits to familiarise themselves with the Company’s operations.

Directors are also provided with papers, presentations and briefings on the Company’s operations and on matters which may affect the Company. These are provided in addition to Board papers and are designed to assist the Directors to gain relevant and timely information to assist in their decision making process. The Company has implemented a secure electronic information repository to facilitate access to past and present Board documentation and other relevant reference material. Directors are also encouraged to undertake continuing education relevant to the discharge of their obligations as Directors of the Company. Subject to prior approval by the Company Secretary, the reasonable cost of such education is met by the Company.

Position Descriptions

The Board has developed and adopted written position descriptions for the Non-executive Chairman of the Board, the Chairman of each Board Committee, the Managing Director/CEO and the Company Secretary.

These delineate the role and responsibility of each position and provide clarity on the expectations for those individuals occupying these key positions within the Company.

Conflicts of Interest

The Code of Conduct for Directors, a copy of which is available on the Company’s website, sets out the procedure to be followed if there is, or may be, a conflict between the personal or other interests of a Director and the business of the Company. A Director with an actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to a matter before the Board does not receive the Board papers relating to that matter and when the matter comes before the Board for discussion, the Director withdraws from the meeting for the period the matter is considered and takes no part in the discussions or decision-making process.

Minutes reporting on matters in which a Director is considered to have a conflict of interest are not provided to that Director, however, the Director is given notice of the nature of the matter for discussions and, as much as practicable, of the general nature of the discussion or decision reached.


Details of the remuneration policies and practices of the Company and the remuneration paid to the Directors (Executive and Non-executive) and senior executives are set out in the Remuneration Report included in the Directors’ Report. Shareholders will be invited to consider and to approve the Remuneration Report at the AGM in November 2010.

In relation to the Non-executive Directors there are no termination or retirement benefits other than those contained in statutory superannuation plans.

Independent Advice

The Board and its Committees may seek advice from independent experts whenever it is considered appropriate. With the consent of the Chairman, individual Directors may seek independent professional advice, at the expense of the Company, on any matter connected with the discharge of their responsibilities. No Director availed himself of this right during the course of the year.